Prediction of Chih-Jen Ho vs Chi-Shan Jao Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ho vs C. Jao

Chih-Jen Ho

TPE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Chi-Shan Jao

TPE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ho 1 - 0 Jao

They have played 3 sets in total, with Chih-Jen Ho winning 2 and Chi-Shan Jao winning 1. The last match between Chih-Jen Ho and Chi-Shan Jao was at the Chinese Taipei F1, 04-07-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chih-Jen Ho getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ho	1
Jao	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) Chinese Taipei F1(07-04-11)

Stats

Chih-Jen Ho

Chi-Shan Jao

C. Ho vs C. Jao H2H Profile

C. Ho	Stats	C. Jao
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.50% (51-69)	Career Total W/L	56.82% (25-19)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Ho vs C. Jao Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chih-Jen Ho has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chi-Shan Jao has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chih-Jen Ho, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chi-Shan Jao has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chih-Jen Ho has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chi-Shan Jao has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chih-Jen Ho has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chi-Shan Jao winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chih-Jen Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 13/15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 35/51). Chi-Shan Jao has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 17/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 8/7).
Player level: In the last year, Chih-Jen Ho has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chi-Shan Jao has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chih-Jen Ho winning 1 times and Chi-Shan Jao being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chih-Jen Ho winning 2 and Chi-Shan Jao winning 1.
The last match between Chih-Jen Ho and Chi-Shan Jao was at the Chinese Taipei F1, 04-07-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chih-Jen Ho getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chih-Jen Ho has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chi-Shan Jao has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chih-Jen Ho has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chi-Shan Jao has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chih-Jen Ho has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chi-Shan Jao has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chih-Jen Ho vs Chi-Shan Jao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ho vs C. Jao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ho	Stats	C. Jao
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ho Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chinese Taipei F1 (Taipei) - 12-06-2017
R1 Kuan-Yi LeeK. Lee	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Kaohsiung Challenger - 21-09-2015
Q2 Daniil MedvedevD. Medvedev	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Li-Wie TanL. Tan	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
Chinese Taipei F2 - 24-08-2015
R1 Yan BaiY. Bai	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Hong Kong F3 - 22-06-2015
R1 Ken OnodaK. Onoda	L	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Jao Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F24 (Champaign) - 17-07-2017
Q1 Travis TresslerT. Tressler	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
Q3 Jeffrey SchorschJ. Schorsch	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q2 Tomas StillmanT. Stillman	W	3-6 7-6(8) 6-4	Stats
USA F36 - 07-11-2016
Q2 Sam RifficeS. Riffice	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Daniel KerznermanD. Kerznerman	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Ho vs C. Jao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ho	Stats	C. Jao
42.50% (51/69)	YTD Win/Loss	56.82% (25/19)
41.86% (108/150)	Sets Win/Loss	57.43% (58/43)
46.74% (1060/1208)	Games Win/Loss	54.75% (478/395)
40.70% (35/51)	Hard Win/Loss	58.62% (17/12)
46.43% (13/15)	Clay Win/Loss	53.33% (8/7)
50.00% (3/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0
9	Aces Total	0
0.01	Double Faults Per Game	0
11	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
447.07	Average Opponent Rank	206.27
71% (398/564)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
59% (233/398)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
43% (71/166)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
43% (18/42)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
36% (201/560)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
33.33% (3/6)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
43.24% (48/63)	Futures W/L	56.82% (25/19)
41% (48/116)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (25/44)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
73% (11/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (4/6)
57% (12/21)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (5/13)
84% (50/42)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (25/21)
16% (50/8)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (25/4)
10% (69/7)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (19/4)